7 Widely Believed Myths Of SEO
*This is a guest post by Christopher Holland*
I recently signed up to a few business and SEO forums and was amazed at what people still recommend.
As there are so many people offering outdated or wrong tips and tricks on how to improve your search engine optimisation (SEO) campaigns, I thought I’d let you know of some of the biggest myths around.
Search engines are always changing their algorithms, and over the past decade things have changed dramatically. Due to complexity of this industry, and the rapid changes, this has led to the many believed SEO myths which I have listed below.
1) Submit your websites to search engines
I still hear about people submitting their website to Google and other search engines to get indexed and to “rank higher” – this just simply isn’t true anymore. It has been at least 5 years since this technique has been necessary and all you need to do is obtain a few backlinks and make sure your not blocking robots from crawling your website.
There are still hundreds and hundreds (probably thousands) of websites that either have lots of keywords spammed at the bottom of their website or within their content. This will do more harm than good, and it’s almost a certainty that you will get penalised and dropped from the results.
So instead of spamming, I recommend that you write great content targeted towards your visitors and to include your chosen keywords naturally (this should not be a problem as you should be targeting relevant keywords to the page).
3) Content length
A while ago, there was a big rumour that went around saying that you need to have a specific number of words in order to get indexed and to increase your position.
Your content should be as long as it needs to be to tell the reader exactly what you need to.
4) Keyword rich domain name
It is still widely believed that if you have keywords within your domain name like www.website-design-nbat-digital.co.uk, that it will improve your rankings. This is not true. Your domain should be short, contain your company name and most importantly be easy to remember.
Note from Ann: I actually still believe in this one 
(But not in spamming your domain with keywords though)
5) Meta Tags are no longer relevant
To an extent this is true, but there are still some uses for the META tags. First off, I’d like to say that the keywords tag is no longer used by the main search engines, and therefore does not need including, let alone optimising.
Now that’s out the way, let’s move onto the other main META tag – description. The description tag does not affect rankings in anyway, but it’s a chance for you to try and sell your company and to get a user to click on your website. If you can write a compelling ad that is about your product or service, then you could see your click through rates increase through the roof.
Finally, the title tag. This is the most important tag which highly contributes to your on page optimisation. You should include your main keyword as close to the beginning as you can and of course don’t fill it with unrelated keywords.
6) Pay Per Click will help or hurt your organic rankings
Running a Pay per click (PPC) campaign will not directly affect your organic rankings. However, by occupying two positions for the same keyword you give the user a choice, and while the PPC ad can be good for getting extra traffic, some of the PPC visitors will come from those who previously might have clicked on the organic listing.
7) NoFollow links are a waste of time
Anyone running a link building campaign should acquire both NoFollow and DoFollow links. Not only will this look far more natural but studies suggest that not all search engines pay attention to the NoFollow attribute and in fact value them the same as a DoFollow link.
This article was by Christopher Holland, who is a search engine marketer for nbat Digital – professional web design and search engine optimisation services. Follow us on twitter – @nbatdigital or take a look at our blog.
77 Responses to “7 Widely Believed Myths Of SEO”
Recent Comments
- Nijin @blogseoads.com on Search Engine Optimization Gone Bad
- winona on Social Media Marketing for Real Estate (Infographic)
- Dipak Rajyaguru on Link Evaluation Survey 2012
- Nick Stamoulis on Search Engine Optimization Gone Bad
- XNUMERIK on Importance of NoFollow Links In Driving Traffic
Friends and Partners
Tags
Archives
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
thank you for shattering these myths! i can lay my doubts to rest on these seven, and away i go towards hundreds more!
Hi Christopher! 7 Myths Of SEO reminds me of the 7 deadly sins – now, which (hu)man does not want to indulge in them. Like Ann noted in your ” 4) Keyword rich domain name”, i too would love to live in this myth forever. However, the myth about meatags was worth shattering – thanks for the eye-opener.
Good article, but strategic keyword density really does help you rank.. we’ve done some current tests on it
no follow links from high quality site is still good ya know!
Thanks for a great post, I totally agree on the above but the domain name has a certain value in the step by step way of SEO success.
I have great success following the seo standards and publishing guidelines from Google and other common search engines…
I think that a keyword rich domain can be important for SEO, but not directly. If you can use you domain name as your keywords when talking about and linking then this will help, but on its own it is not a magic pill.
I agree with 6 out of 7 of your myths. Keyword rich domain names are still important, but hard to come by.
very important post…thank you
If you can get a keyword rich, aged domain… that has to be the holy grail.
But that is why they are as rate as hen’s teeth… and so expensive!
thanks… very valuable info
I’d love to know where these myths get started.
I think a lot of times they start with an element of truth… and then they just get magnified out of all proportions.
But generally what works best is common sense surely?
Great post… but on the subject of domains with your keywords in, I have to disagree. I have tried using these on a number of occasions and if you can secure a domain name which is an exact match to your keyphrase, it gives you a massive advantage with Google.
Great post… but on the subject of domains with your keywords in, I have to disagree. I have tried using these on a number of occasions and if you can secure a domain name which is an exact match to your keyphrase, it gives you a massive advantage with Google.
As we recently found algorithmic update to search engine like google, I am sure this kind of things gonna work for seo. The time now is to serve unique content, which can help to track your website easily and index it into google so fast.
Very nice clarification! Basically, one should do a natural and organic website with good content! No spamming, no cheats, just as it should be! Sounds good!
Nice post, and I agree with the note from Ann Re point 4… A keyword here can help with your SERPs
Rather beneficial cheers, I reckon your trusty subscribers might just want a great deal more stories such as this continue the great hard work.
Great list, exact match domains are still much easier to rank. Google have said this themselves and also said they are planning on winding back the effect (but they haven’t said they will kill it completely) and I don’t believe they ever will.
It’s debatable whether having keywords in your domain if it’s not an exact match helps, I suspect it still does help a little bit but I agree I would rather a shorter, nicer domain
BTW your form thinks everything I write is spam!
Thanks a lot for the information. It really helps a lot thinking Google is not “blind” to some kind of spam.
Thanks a lot for the advise,
Morcao