What If Part of the Word Looks Like a Spam
There is an interesting discussion taking place at WebmasterWorld forums that discusses how the word “specialist” can be treated by search engines. The thing is that if you start optimizing for it (e.g. including it in the title tags, anchor text, etc), this may look suspicious to search engines because of “cialis” embedded into it.
It is actually sounds quite probable – and even if that’s just a suspicion, rumor or just good old FAD, you may at least be aware of that.
From the discussion:
I don’t think anchor text would be an issue – semantic analysis seems to be better than that today. But you might want to avoid using the word in file names. Because some web developers simply concatenate the words in filenames, I do see occasional evidence that “hidden words” get picked up.
One Response to “What If Part of the Word Looks Like a Spam”
Recent Comments
- Nijin @blogseoads.com on Search Engine Optimization Gone Bad
- winona on Social Media Marketing for Real Estate (Infographic)
- Dipak Rajyaguru on Link Evaluation Survey 2012
- Nick Stamoulis on Search Engine Optimization Gone Bad
- XNUMERIK on Importance of NoFollow Links In Driving Traffic
Friends and Partners
Tags
Archives
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009





If that is really true, which I have hard times to believe, I guess it should not be a problem if we implement common tags http://commontag.org/QuickStartGuide
Don’t you think?